Monday, February 6, 2012

Why are there cookies at my gym?

You probably read the title of this post and figured it was just some cute line written to get your attention and that I would then be discussing some other fun topic.  I am saddened to tell you that that could not be further from the truth.  I really want to know why there were cookies at my gym.  Chocolate chip cookies. In the break room. Right in the middle of the table.  REALLY??? I resisted the urge to toss them in the trash, although to this moment I am not really sure why.

Let's back up just a little.  What is a gym and why do people go there? Searching for the definition of 'gym' you find this: noun, 1. gymnasium, 2. a membership organization that provides a range of facilities designed to improve and maintain physical fitness and health. But nothing about cookies.  In fact, I would dare go as fas as to say that by its definition cookies do not belong in a gym. Well, unless they are designed to improve or maintain one's health. I don't care WHAT kind of cookie you find, it will not do that.  I don't care if it is all natural, 100% organic, gluten free or vegan.  It is a cookie and it will not improve your health.  Therefore it does NOT belong in my gym.

Imagine yourself as a member of the gym.  You walk in all fired up for your training session, having been focused on it and your healthy eating plan for some time now, and in walks a gym employee with cookies or pizza..or better yet, what if it was a delivery man?   What  goes through your mind?  "What the..??!!"
EXAAACCCCTLY!  That is the same thing I say when I see the evidence of such goings-on.  C'mon people, you are here to help people become healthier. Leave the crap at home.  Having cookies at the gym is like leaving a brochure for shoddy hedge-fund investing in the break room of a bank.  You are going to tell people to exercise and eat healthy, then come to the break room and eat your pizza and cookies and drink your soda.  Does that make you feel good about what you are doing? Do you even think about it?
....maybe you should.










Wednesday, January 18, 2012

Crave knowledge? Save the internet..

Hello Friends,

If any of you have tried to use Wikipedia today or have investigated why there is a big black box over the Google logo then you are already aware of this. There are two pieces of legislation being considered by congress (H.R. 3261, also known as the Stop Online Piracy Act & Senate Bill 968, also known as the PROTECT IP Act) that if made into law would have several negative effects for the internet as we know it.  Everything I have been able to read about these two pieces of legislation leads me to the conclusion that it would be detrimental to a free and open internet if they were passed.  Please do your own research and make up your own mind but I would ask that you consider taking a quick moment to email your representative and senators and urging them to vote against this legislation.

Read more about SOPA and PIPA here:
https://www.google.com/landing/takeaction/sopa-pipa/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:SOPA_initiative/Learn_more

Send this to your representative:

I want you to know that I strongly oppose H.R. 3261, also known as the Stop Online Piracy Act.  Not only would this bill be ineffective at achieving it's own stated goal but it would also have the detrimental effect of censoring the internet, hindering economic growth, and slowing innovation with regards to online technologies.  I urge you to vote against this bill.

You can find out who your representative is and his/her email address by clicking on the link below and then entering your state and zip code:

https://writerep.house.gov/writerep/welcome.shtml

Send this to your two senators (there are two from each state):

I want you to know that I strongly oppose Senate Bill 968, also known as the PROTECT IP Act.  Not only would this bill be ineffective at achieving it's own stated goal but it would also have the detrimental effect of censoring the internet, hindering economic growth, and slowing innovation with regards to online technologies.  I urge you to vote against this bill.

You can find out who your senators are and their email addresses by clicking on the link below and then choosing your state:

http://www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm



THANK YOU!!!

Saturday, January 14, 2012

The Truth About Weight Loss

It seems that after reading Tara Parker-Pope's NY Times article "The Fat Trap" http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/01/magazine/tara-parker-pope-fat-trap.html?pagewanted=all quite a few of us readers had the same idea to blog about it.  Most of the blog posts were praising her for finally revealing to the public the challenges that face the overweight and obese.  I have a few issues with her piece and the bloggers celebrating her unveiling of the science suggesting that the weight will just come back.

Honestly, Parker-Pope made it seem almost hopeless. Citing studies such as one in 2009 by Joseph Prioetto in Australia.  His study placed 50 obese men and women on a very low calorie diet (500-550 calories per day) for eight weeks.  Participants did lose weight, but within a year many participants had gained back about half of the weight they had originally lost.  Participants also reported feeling hungrier and thinking more about food than they had before they lost the weight.  Parker-Pope goes on to cite scientific information about the hormonal changes that occur during, and as a result of, weight loss.  She cites these hormonal changes as the reason overweight individuals are unable to maintain weight loss.

“What we see here is a coordinated defense mechanism with multiple components all directed toward making us put on weight,” Proietto says. “This, I think, explains the high failure rate in obesity treatment.”

Now, wait just a minute here.  Yes, I read the same study that shows hormones responsible for hunger and metabolism are affected, but that does NOT mean that maintaining weight loss is impossible.
First of all..WHY does someone need to go on a 500-550 calorie a day diet for eight weeks? and WHY would you expect your body NOT to fight to regain weight after such a long period of time under basically starvation like conditions? What would happen if we took a better approach to the situation maybe approaching weight loss as a lifestyle change? Yes, it will take longer to get it off, but did you become obese in eight weeks? Why then would you think that you could lose the weight in that amount of time? Maybe losing weight without such drastic measures would not result in the reported hormonal changes.

Parker-Pope writes:  "For years, the advice to the overweight and obese has been that we simply need to eat less and exercise more. While there is truth to this guidance, it fails to take into account that the human body continues to fight against weight loss long after dieting has stopped. This translates into a sobering reality: once we become fat, most of us, despite our best efforts, will probably stay fat."


She goes on to cite research that identified a number of genes which may 'predispose' people to being overweight- or even to desire fattier foods. Why not just give up now? Well, hold on she DOES go on to discuss the National Weight Control Registry.  The registry follows 10,000 people who have lost a minimum of 30 pounds and successfully kept it off for at least a year. So there IS hope! Don't worry, she stomps on that too as she mentions the extraordinary measures people go through to maintain that weight loss. One successful person has this to say: “It’s one of the hardest things there is,” she says. “It’s something that has to be focused on every minute. I’m not always thinking about food, but I am always aware of food.”


Parker-Pope interviewed Kelly Brownell, director of the Rudd Center for Food Policy and Obesity at Yale University who had this to say about the 10,000 people in the National Weight Control Registry: "“All it means is that there are rare individuals who do manage to keep it off.. You find these people are incredibly vigilant about maintaining their weight. Years later they are paying attention to every calorie, spending an hour a day on exercise. They never don’t think about their weight.”


Parker-Pope goes on to describe several individuals who go to great lengths to maintain their weight loss: measuring all of their food, keeping food and exercise logs, carrying a water bottle all day each and every day, exercising more than an hour each day 6 or 7 days each week, avoiding bread, pasta, desserts and eating a larger percent of calories form protein.  She has this to say about one very committed individual: 
"Just talking to Bridge about the effort required to maintain her weight is exhausting. I find her story inspiring, but it also makes me wonder whether I have what it takes to be thin. I have tried on several occasions (and as recently as a couple weeks ago) to keep a daily diary of my eating and exercise habits, but it’s easy to let it slide. I can’t quite imagine how I would ever make time to weigh and measure food when some days it’s all I can do to get dinner on the table between finishing my work and carting my daughter to dance class or volleyball practice. And while I enjoy exercising for 30- or 40-minute stretches, I also learned from six months of marathon training that devoting one to two hours a day to exercise takes an impossible toll on my family life."

WOW! That's all I could say when I read her article.  So in a nut-shell she is saying that weight loss is a challenge and she doesn't think she can dedicate the time necessary to do it.  Hmmm, as a trainer I have heard THAT before..but that is not what is actually being said..what that actually means is that you don't WANT to do it.  So I would question your desire to lose weight, to be healthy, to be a good role model for your children, family and friends.  Harsh? Nope, I don't think so.  Look at it like this.  If someone wanted to become a journalist for saaaaayyy the NY Times, I'm sure there is a good bit of schooling that must be undertaken. Certain degrees attained, many hours interning, studying, writing, investigating.  Hours of interviewing and job hunting.  You may even say that there wasn't a minute that went by when the thought of this dream job wasn't in her head. Hmmmm, so if something is really important to someone they will take the time necessary to achieve that goal regardless of the time or effort it takes. Yep, I'll agree with that. So if someone will go through such great lengths to attain a degree or a job, why should  improved health or weight loss be portrayed as something not deserving of such attention?

Ohhh that's right because you can work hard and still not succeed because of those silly genes. Yes, the ones that make some of us crave fattier foods and eat more calories.  WHAT?? Ok, I'm not denying that those genes exist, clearly if scientists have identified them then there are there.  Let's stop and think about this for a moment though.  If those genes are in us NOW, couldn't it be a rather safe assumption that there were in us 50, 100, 150 years ago as well?  If so why has the number of overweight and obese continued to climb with each passing year or decade? If those genes have always been present then the numbers of overweight and obese persons should remain rather constant.  These people would also be found in many other countries and not predominantly in the United States of America.
Hmmmm..maybe just maybe it DOES have something to do with the foods (or non-foods as I see them) that people in this great country are consuming.  Maybe, just maybe it would be a worthwhile endeavor to keep a food log and spend time thinking about what we eat.

Darnit, there I go bringing it back to personal responsibility and paying attention to what you are eating. My husband and I have this conversation all the time.  It would be nearly impossible for someone to eat healthy foods and be fat.  Really, do you understand how hard it would be for you to be fat eating lean protein (meats, fish, chicken, turkey, egg..) and vegetables?

God forbid you should have to exercise.  Having to exercise over an hour a day, six to 7 days a week?? GASP! Haaaaa.  This always makes me laugh.  The human body was not meant to sit around.  It was meant to be used..to 'exercise'.  Get off your butt.  People see nothing wrong with spending 8 hours a day working a job..trying to accomplish something, to be good at something. Yet it is inconceivable to exercise for an hour?? Are you kidding me? Do you WANT to lose weight? Do you want to succeed at THAT job? If you are unwilling to spend an hour exercising, or say that you are 'unable' to do it..then your answer is 'NO!'.  I'm ok with that..just don't complain that you can't lose weight or that you can't keep it off.  You get out exactly what you put in.  If your results aren't what you want, reevaluate your approach.

So here's the truth:
Step one- do not become overweight.  It would be a tremendous challenge to become overweight eating only lean protein and vegetables.
Step two-if you are overweight, see step one.
Step three- realize that it WILL take conscious effort AND time to lose weight and KEEP IT OFF.

Delayed gratification is not something we Americans do well with. We don't want it now, we want it last week.  Repercussions? Who cares, give it to me yesterday.  This desire to have things RIGHT NOW is even more common when it comes to weight loss.  Maybe just maybe if we explained this to people we would  have a better chance of actually effecting lifestyle changes, successful weight loss AND weight management.




Tuesday, December 27, 2011

Be resolute...

Well here we are, January is right around the corner. You know what that means. Yep, time to make your resolutions. Don't want to be left out of the talk on Jan 1st..you KNOW everyone will be talking about their resolutions, so you'd better decide now what yours will be. I am sincerely hoping you read that with the amount of sarcasm I was typing it with...

I know it has been an entire year (well almost) and many of you may have forgotten MY New Year's Resolution so I thought I would re-post it for you.  Happy reading..and happy New Year!


SATURDAY, JANUARY 1, 2011

New Year's Resolutions

Happy New Year everyone!!! My hope is that it will be your happiest and healthiest one yet!

One key to making this happen...NO MORE NEW YEARS RESOLUTIONS!!!!!! Yes, you read that right.  Stop making them!!! I made one years ago and have stuck with it ever since....my resolution was to never make one again.  "But Michelle", you are thinking "how else will I reach my goals?"
Well, I didn't say that you couldn't or shouldn't make changes and aim for your goals, but it is absurd to think that just because it it January 1 (or a Monday or any other arbitrary day) you will somehow magically stick with those changes.  Why do you think that only 10% of the people that make resolutions actually stick to them?? Because they were the only ones READY to make the changes!!!! The fact is, you will stick to them when you are READY.  So if you feel you are ready to do it today, well then do it. If you felt you were motivated and ready on December 27th, then you should have started it then...and not waited until today...you may have lost that spark of motivation and deep desire to attain your goal.  If you are ready 2 months from now well do it then.  My point? Making resolutions when you are not ready to embrace them is a sure fire recipe for disaster and just plain stupid.  Not only will you fail to stick with the plan, you will be much less likely to attempt that (or any other) change in the future.

Tuesday, December 13, 2011

Yes you CAN!

Cashier: "I wish I could eat this healthy."
Me: "You can."
Cashier: "I know."
Me: "Well..."
Cashier: "I usually just eat things I can grab fast."
Me (with a puzzled look as she is scanning my raw vegetables): "You can grab these fast."
Cashier: "My 2 month old makes it hard for me."
Me: nothing..just a smile

Well, what was I supposed to say? She had all of her excuses lined up already.  Raw veggies, doesn't get much quicker than that. Blaming someone else for your eating habits gives away your power of choice.  You are at their mercy, you eat what they tell you to eat, or what they allow you to eat.  No wonder she can't eat the way she wants.
Any time you say that someone else 'makes' you do something, or any time you name someone else as a 'reason' why you are doing something or why you cannot do something, you are giving away YOUR power.  In your head you are just trying to escape the blame (really the responsibility) for the situation in which you find yourself.   Whether you realize it or not, you do not believe you have the power to make the choice. Subsequently, you never WILL make that choice.  It is time to realize this and take full responsibility for where you are as well as for where you are going.  YOU are the only one that puts food into your mouth. YOU are responsible for your choices and actions, and therefore the results of your actions as well.

 More than once I have heard people discussing this diet or that diet and commenting that "anyone can do it". Citing that it isn't restrictive and you can eat anything you want.  Hmmmm...yes anyone CAN do that.  In fact, most people are doing that NOW. That would be why the majority of the US population is either over weight or obese.  More than 66% of our population falls into this category. Here's a hint: if the majority of people are following a certain 'diet', it isn't working.  It is making them fat, so step away and do it quickly.  The other part of the 'diet anyone can do' mind set that frustrates me is this--why would someone feel that eating healthy is hard, or something that not everyone can do?? That mindset is exactly what is keeping people from eating healthy.  Apparently choosing healthy foods is something reserved for only a select few.

Here are two rules for being healthy. Learn them and live them.
1. YOU are responsible for what goes into your mouth, no one else.
2. No, you CANNOT eat whatever you want (no matter what that infomercial tells you).

Pretty simple, right? The sooner you own the fact that YOU are the one that got you where you are now, that YOU are the one that keeps you from getting where you want to go, the sooner YOU can get yourself where you want to be.  You are your worst enemy or your best asset, the choice is yours.  Damn, there is that word again 'choice'.  Own the choice, own the result.

No, you cannot eat whatever you want.  Well, ok technically you can, but that will not help you reach your goals.  Well, unless your goals are to fall somewhere in between so-so healthy and completely unhealthy.  If you are looking for optimal health then it is time that you just face the facts.  Eating whatever you want is not the way to go. Look at it like this: everything you ingest becomes a part of you. A part of each and every cell in your body. If your goal is optimal health choose optimal foods.  Ahhh, that sneaky word again. Everything comes back to choice.  Choice and responsibility.  Own them.  You CAN eat healthy, you can BE healthy, you CAN reach your goals.


Wednesday, December 7, 2011

"Can the Bulldog Be Saved?" the cover of the November 27, 2011 The New York Times Magazine questions.  As a lover of Bullys as well as the mother of one, my interest was piqued.  Well, that and the fact that the picture of the sweet baby on the cover looked just like my Bartholomew. I peeled the pages open to find the article and devoured it.

The gist is this..bulldogs have changed over the years. Writer Benoit Denizet-Lewis interviewed some who cite breeding practices to be at fault for the move from taller, leaner more athletic bodied dogs to shorter, heavier less agile ones. In an attempt to create a certain aesthetic, health may have been compromised. The article cites this as the reason for many problems afflicting the breed- heart disease, respiratory issues, birthing/reproductive difficulties, abnormal tooth placement, thyroid issues, skin allergies, digestive disorders, cherry eye, dry eye, hip, elbow and knee issues as well as altered gait.  Some see these health issues as a threat to the longevity of the breed. Can we 'save' the Bulldog from this? Sources cited in the article do believe that the Bulldog can be saved but only if new standards are set and criterion put in place to select for taller, leaner, healthier dogs.

 As I am reading this I actually started to laugh, yes laugh. I couldn't help but to see the parallel between the bulldog and the human.  Both were leaner and healthier not all that long ago.  Both continue to pass on traits that could compromise the health and well being of the entire line.  I'm laughing because for SOME REASON this is something we should be soooo worried about for the bulldog, but NOT the human??? WHAT??!!!! PETA and veterinarians alike are pushing for the American Kennel Club and Bulldog Club of America to change judging standards to favor the physique of a healthier, more resilient dog. They see this as a better representation of the breed, the ideal, if you will.

I am all for making anything healthier, that is for sure but why not start with ourselves? Why must we be so concerned about dogs and have so little reverence for humans? When a dog's health and longevity is compromised we do something about it, yet when our own health and longevity is compromised we just change the standards so we don't look so bad.  WHAT?!

Instead of looking deeper in to this situation we have chosen to modify our definition of what is normal or healthy for humans..but not for dogs? Why does this make sense? Oh yeah, that's right- IT DOESN'T!!!!! Clothing companies have modified the definition of their sizes.  I KNOW I am not smaller than I was in high school, but for some reason I wear sizes that are much smaller than I did back then.  All of this in an effort to keep people from feeling bad about themselves.  Changing the size of airplane, movie theater and car seats as well? Yep, wouldn't want anyone to have to squeeze in too much.  If we were bulldogs PETA would argue that we are endangering our line and that we should do something to stop moving further in the direction of total demise. Denizet-Lewis says:
"Jemima Harrison, the director of "Pedigree Dogs Exposed," told me it is possible to produce a healthier phenotype in most breeds pretty quickly (in three to four generations). ..."If breeders were willing to breed dogs with fewer exaggerated characteristics and judges in the show ring began rewarding those dogs, change could happen."

So, might it also be possible to change the direction of the human population? I certainly think so, but it will NOT happen on accident.  Continuing in the manner in which we have will find us in the same place as the bulldog. Just as the ideal bulldog may be redefined, we too must redefine the ideal human.  When I say 'ideal', NO I am not talking the Hitler-esque 'ideal'.  I am talking about a healthy individual.  Healthy physically and mentally.  We are responsible for the continuation of a healthy human population.  Today is the first step..commit to making a change for the better.  Lead by example for your family and friends.  Be the shining light of truth regarding nutrition and exercise. If we commit to starting NOW we can begin to undo our own demise.  If not, well...I don't want to go there.

Someone once told me that when you point your finger at something, you have 3 fingers pointing back at you. Let's stop pointing our finger at everything else and talking about what is wrong with IT, let's look at the 3 fingers pointing back at us and let's start with what is wrong with US!


Wednesday, November 16, 2011

Why is the truth so hard to find?

I often sit and wonder if I am the only one so fired up about lies in the food industry and the world of nutrition.  Maybe I am the only one that notices.  Surely I must be, otherwise the lies and misinformation would not be there.  There is NO WAY our leaders or government would allow this to happen, right? Companies that lie or misrepresent their products go to jail, are fined, or at least made to openly apologize, right? Cough, cough, cough.  Sorry I almost choked on my Cheerios.

Social media is a great way to keep up with things these days.  Something happens and "blammo" it is out there for everyone to see.  It hadn't even been 2 minutes and everyone in the country-better yet, around the world- was aware that Kim Kardashian was getting divorced.  Or how about when Seal Team Six went in after Saddam? What about learning that General Mills does not need to tell you that the fiber in Fiber One bars is not the same as fiber you would get from 'real food'?  It was on Facebook. You didn't hear about that? What? Really?? Nope, they do not have to tell you that.  So says a judge that heard the class action lawsuit. Yet this 'fake fiber' does not have the health benefits of real fiber, may cause stomach issues, or may even harm women. Specifically women who are pregnant or breast feeding.
http://www.topclassactions.com/lawsuit-settlements/lawsuit-news/1446-general-mills-a-kellogg-fiber-bar-class-action-lawsuit-tossed

An Illinois federal judge disagreed, however, writing that current legislation does not require companies to disclose that processed fiber offers fewer health benefits than natural fiber. And while states may ask for certain exceptions under the federal law, Illinois never obtained one to impose stricter standards.
"It's easy to see why Congress would not want to allow states to impose disclosure requirements of their own on packaged food products, most of which are sold nationwide," Judge Posner wrote. "Manufacturers might have to print 50 different labels, driving consumers who buy food products in more than one state crazy."

Haaa. Ok wait just a minute.  Did you say it is easy to see why Congress would not want to impose disclosure???? You're telling me it would drive people crazy because you would have to make 50 different labels for the product? I must be missing something here.  How about you just make ONE and you have it represent the product accurately.  Meaning you tell the truth.  Why is that so hard to figure out? Don't worry, there will still be plenty of people buying your 'fake fiber' product.  Just look at the number of people still buying McDonald's...and they list the actual fake ingredients of their products..for everyone to see.

Judge Posner said the labeling of Fiber Plus bars, Fiber One bars and other nutritional bar products challenged in the class action lawsuit is compliant with current federal regulations relating to health claims for dietary fibers. 

Oh I see..the problem is that the federal guidelines do not require them to tell the truth...THAT is where social media can work for us to effect change.  Why do I feel that I am the only one making any noise about this?  YOU can do something about this! Use your Facebook, Twitter, website, blog, or email and let your friends, followers, fans, and readers know what is going on.  Certainly if more people knew what was going on more people would demand change. People would demand the truth.  We are killing ourselves with this fake food and the lies that cover it up.

Another fun tidbit found on Facebook (incase you missed it on the news). Pizza is a vegetable.  Yes, you read that right.  Congress has decided that pizza is a vegetable. http://today.msnbc.msn.com/id/45306416/ns/today-today_health/t/pizza-vegetable-congress-says-yes/#.TsQ9WmBEDEU

Well, it is especially a vegetable when served in schools for lunch.  Seems that some folks got their undies tied in bunches when they were confronted with removing pizza and french fries from school lunches.  The article goes on to say that "...some conservatives in Congress say the federal government shouldn't be telling children what to eat." Cough, cough, cough..darn those Cheerios, almost choked again.

Ok, let me see if I'm getting this straight.  Conservatives think that if they remove pizza and french fries from school lunches then they are telling kids what to eat..meaning they are telling them to eat what is served (the replacement for the pizza and fries)..and Congress does not think that the federal government has the right to do that. Hmmm..ok, so doesn't that then mean that the federal government is telling children to eat whatever they are serving now (pizza and french fries)?? I'm confused.  So if they change what is served then the government is telling kids what to eat, but if they leave it the way it is then they aren't?

Riiiiiiight. I think there is a class that I have missed somewhere along the way called "How to Rationalize Things: The Political Version".  I'm guessing that the book for that class is really small and reads like this: 'Whatever works for me at the time is the truth and what I say goes, period.'

Yes, a tomato is a vegetable.  When it is convenient.  Otherwise it is a fruit. And pizza crust is whole grain.

C'mon people, these are the children that will run the country when you and I are old.  Shouldn't we try to keep them healthy and teach them to tell the truth?  Not just lie because it works at the moment, and oh- by- the- way- we can save lots of money if we pretend french fries and pizza are good for you.

Republicans on the House Appropriations Committee said the changes would "prevent overly burdensome and costly regulations and to provide greater flexibility for local school districts to improve the nutritional quality of meals."
School districts had said some of the USDA requirements went too far and cost too much when budgets are extremely tight. 

What cost is too high to ensure the health of our children, our country, our future?
This bill will be voted on this week by YOUR congressmen.  Please read the article and let them know what you think..before it is too late!.